ORCID as entered in ROS

Select Publications
2025, Not so great expectations: The role of price and name information in the nocebo effect, http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9jq7t
,2024, People Who Believe Implausible Claims are not Cognitive Misers: Evidence from Evaluation Tasks, http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/n35sc
,2024, The Role of Expectations and Tailored Feedback on the Open-Label Placebo Effect, http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nvsyq
,2024, Valuing different forms of knowledge predicts belief in epistemically suspect claims: Development and validation of the Foundations of Knowledge Questionnaire, http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cz975
,2023, The effect of social learning on the nocebo effect: a systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for the future, http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3ez74
,2022, Peer-to-peer: The social transmission of symptoms online, http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/sy6ph
,2022, SOCIAL COMMUNICATION PATHWAYS TO COVID-19 VACCINE SIDE-EFFECT EXPECTATIONS AND EXPERIENCE, http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/e2bfv
,2022, The impact of side effect framing on COVID-19 booster vaccine intentions in an Australian sample, http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.09.22274840
,2021, Covid-19 Attitudes Data, http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4qrb8
,2020, Acute mental health responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.03.20089961
,2020, Correlates of Health-Protective Behavior During the Initial Days of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Norway, http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6vgf4
,2020, Public perceptions of COVID-19 in Australia: perceived risk, knowledge, health-protective behaviours, and vaccine intentions, http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.25.20079996
,2019, Understanding and Preventing Health Concerns About Emerging Mobile Health Technologies (Preprint), http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/preprints.14375
,